Kilts: Hot or not?

Not sexy.
The /idea/ is sexy.
The lack of underclothes is sexy.
But the reality is that not even Sean Connery looks good in a kilt.

http://www.kiltmen.com/photogallery4.htm

Kilts are hot.
Utilikilts are hotter.

see, my equation would be more like: tartan = grandma = grandmaish = matronly = precious moments figurine.

Let's be real, since when has easy access to that part of a man ever been a real issue?

I find this a disturbing look into women's minds. )

I am inclined to theorize that as with most things, if a person sees an attractive person in something like a kilt, they are going to think that thing attractive. The only thing I know that even attractive people look lousy in (from my perspective, of course) would be a pair of Birkenstocks, expecially when worn with socks.

Any kilt-like garment is, of course, hot as hell on a woman, as long as she's not too old and/or has unappealing legs. I don't think too many women over 40 could pull it off. Not that they would necessarily look bad; they just wouldn't look hot. Everytime some dumb stylist dresses Katie Couric as if she were 19, for instance, I'm put off for a week.